学术周报 · IF≥10
护理领域文献阅读汇编
2026年第36周 (2026-09-02) | PubMed (NLM) · DeepSeek 中英双语
数据来源: PubMed E-utilities · 影响因子筛选≥10 · 完整摘要不截断
数据来源: PubMed E-utilities · 影响因子筛选≥10 · 完整摘要不截断
★本周 Top 10 高影响力文献
Ŧ期刊分布统计
| 期刊 | 篇数 | IF |
|---|---|---|
| British journal of anaesthesia | 3 | IF 10.3 |
| Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology | 3 | IF 12.3 |
| Acta biomaterialia | 1 | IF 10.4 |
| EClinicalMedicine | 1 | IF 12.8 |
| Stroke | 1 | IF 11.1 |
| Drugs | 1 | IF 14.7 |
| Bioactive materials | 1 | IF 23.6 |
| JAMA internal medicine | 1 | IF 26.3 |
| Circulation | 1 | IF 41.3 |
| Nature communications | 1 | IF 18.1 |
1伤口/造口护理 (3篇)
临床研究 (2篇)
Dermatologists have expertise in diagnosing and managing many ulcerative conditions. However, dermatology training often lacks substantial teaching or hands-on experience in wound care. Proper wound management begins with accurately identifying the underlying cause of a wound, along with any patient-specific factors that may impede healing. These factors help guide the selection of appropriate wound care techniques and dressings. The main categories of dressings include films, foams, alginates, hydrogels, hydrocolloids, gelling fibers, and super-absorbents. For critically colonized wounds, or those at higher risk of infection, antimicrobial-impregnated dressings may be utilized. Highly exudative wounds require absorptive dressings, whereas dry wounds benefit from dressings that provide and maintain moisture. Importantly, addressing patient-specific concerns, such as the frequency of dressing changes, cost, ease of application, and comfort, is essential for promoting adherence and improving quality of life. This report provides guidance on the clinical assessment of wounds, key considerations in dressing selection based on wound characteristics, and a summary of traditional wound dressings and their indications.
中文摘要:皮肤科医生在诊断和管理多种溃疡性疾病方面具有专业知识。然而,皮肤科培训往往缺乏伤口护理方面的实质性教学或实践经验。恰当的伤口管理始于准确识别伤口的根本原因,以及可能阻碍愈合的患者个体因素。这些因素有助于指导选择合适的伤口护理技术和敷料。敷料的主要类别包括薄膜、泡沫、藻酸盐、水凝胶、水胶体、凝胶纤维和超级吸收剂。对于严重定植的伤口或感染风险较高的伤口,可使用含抗菌剂的敷料。高渗出性伤口需要吸收性敷料,而干燥伤口则受益于能够提供并保持水分的敷料。重要的是,解决患者个体化问题,如更换敷料的频率、成本、易用性和舒适度,对于促进依从性和改善生活质量至关重要。本报告就伤口的临床评估、基于伤口特性的敷料选择关键考虑因素以及传统伤口敷料及其适应症进行了总结。
Biological products, including tissue-engineered skin tissue and growth factors, have become important treatment options for wound repair and regeneration. Tissue-based products include components that replicate the properties of normal human skin, such as fibroblast and keratinocyte cell culture, to promote healing and remodeling. These products can generally be categorized as epidermal, dermal, or composite skin replacements, and more recently as cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products (CAMPs). Selection is based on wound type, location, dimension, presence of undermining, and condition of the periwound skin. Despite multiple studies on cost-effectiveness, drawbacks to tissue-based products and advanced wound therapies include high cost, limited access, short shelf-life, specific storage requirements, and restricted indications. This review provides a summary of the indications and limitations of the types of CAMPs and biomaterials available for the treatment of wounds.
中文摘要:生物制品,包括组织工程皮肤组织和生长因子,已成为伤口修复和再生的重要治疗选择。基于组织的产品包含复制正常人皮肤特性的成分,如成纤维细胞和角质形成细胞培养,以促进愈合和重塑。这些产品通常可分为表皮、真皮或复合皮肤替代品,以及最近的细胞、无细胞和基质样产品(CAMPs)。选择基于伤口类型、位置、尺寸、是否存在潜行以及伤口周围皮肤状况。尽管有许多关于成本效益的研究,但基于组织的产品和先进伤口疗法的缺点包括高成本、可及性有限、保质期短、特定储存要求以及适应症受限。本综述总结了可用于伤口治疗的各类CAMPs和生物材料的适应症和局限性。
基础研究 (1篇)
The management of heavily exuding infected wounds is complicated by excessive exudates, persistent bacterial colonization, and secondary trauma during dressing changes. Here, we develop a bioinspired "liquid-solid" biphasic dressing designed to address these challenges simultaneously. This dressing integrates a hylarana guentheri mucus-inspired medical antibacterial oil (guest phase) within a concave nanofiber membrane that mimics the structure of octopus suckers (host phase). This unique architecture enables an exudate-triggered self-adaptive gating mechanism, where the oil-filled concaves act as pressure-deformable gates. High hydrostatic pressure from excess exudate opens the gates for unidirectional transport, while low pressure maintains a closed state, thus dynamically regulating moisture and creating an optimal healing environment. The integrated oil, infused with thymol, establishes a synergistic "defend-and-attack" antibacterial barrier, preventing biofilm formation and neutralizing planktonic E. coli and S. aureus. The same oil layer provides a low-adhesion interface, enabling nearly painless dressing changes with minimal peeling force. In an infected wound model, the dressing accelerates healing, suppresses inflammatory cytokine expression, and reduces bacterial burden. This "liquid-solid" strategy offers a promising paradigm for developing next-generation smart biomaterials for complex wound care.
中文摘要:受生物启发的「液-固」双相敷料,具有渗出液门控传输、「防御-攻击」抗菌活性和抗粘连特性,用于渗出性感染伤口治疗。处理重度渗出性感染伤口因过量渗出液、持续性细菌定植和更换敷料时的继发性创伤而变得复杂。在此,我们开发了一种受生物启发的「液-固」双相敷料,旨在同时应对这些挑战。该敷料将合浦蛙黏液启发的医用抗菌油(客体相)整合到模拟章鱼吸盘结构的凹形纳米纤维膜(主体相)中。这种独特的结构实现了渗出液触发的自适应门控机制,其中充油凹面充当压力可变形门。过量渗出液产生的高静水压打开门以进行单向传输,而低压则保持关闭状态,从而动态调节湿度并创造最佳愈合环境。集成油中添加了百里香酚,建立了协同的「防御-攻击」抗菌屏障,防止生物膜形成并中和浮游大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。同一油层提供低粘附界面,使敷料更换几乎无痛,剥离力极小。在感染伤口模型中,该敷料加速愈合,抑制炎症细胞因子表达,并减少细菌负荷。这种「液-固」策略为开发用于复杂伤口护理的下一代智能生物材料提供了一种有前景的范例。
2疼痛护理 (2篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
Lateral quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a potential alternative to intrathecal morphine (ITM) for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. We compared quality of recovery (QoR) and analgesia with lateral QLB, ITM, or ITM+QLB. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women undergoing Caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were allocated to (1) bilateral lateral QLB with 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine; (2) 100 μg preservative-free ITM with sham QLB; or (3) ITM+QLB. The primary outcome was the QoR-40 score at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse effects. Given three-group comparisons, statistical significance was set at P<0.017. Fifty-eight women were analysed. Noninferiority testing for QoR-40 at 24 h between ITM and QLB was inconclusive (mean difference -0.9; 90% confidence interval [CI] -0.9 to 13.5). QLB reduced the resting pain score at 6 h compared with ITM (mean difference 2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 4.5]; P<0.001). Compared with ITM alone, ITM+QLB reduced the resting pain at 6 h (mean difference 3.3 [1.9, 4.8]; P<0.001), coughing pain at 6 h (3.0 [1.4, 4.7]; P<0.001), and worst pain at 24 h (1.8 [0.6, 3.1]; P=0.006). Oxycodone consumption and nausea or vomiting did not differ between groups. Pruritus was more frequent with QLB and ITM+QLB compared with ITM alone but was predominantly mild. Noninferiority of QLB vs ITM for QoR-40 at 24 h was inconclusive. However, QLB reduced early resting pain vs ITM, whereas ITM+QLB further reduced early resting and coughing pain and worst pain at 24 h vs ITM alone. Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings. NCT02871713 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02871713).
中文摘要:侧方腰方肌阻滞(QLB)是剖宫产术后鞘内吗啡(ITM)镇痛的潜在替代方法。我们比较了侧方QLB、ITM或ITM+QLB对恢复质量(QoR)和镇痛效果的影响。在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,接受蛛网膜下腔麻醉下剖宫产术的产妇被分配至以下三组之一:(1)双侧侧方QLB,使用20 ml 0.5%罗哌卡因;(2)100 μg不含防腐剂的ITM加模拟QLB;或(3)ITM+QLB。主要结局是24小时时的QoR-40评分。次要结局包括疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗量和不良事件。鉴于三组比较,统计显著性设定为P<0.017。共分析了58名产妇。ITM与QLB在24小时QoR-40方面的非劣效性检验无定论(平均差-0.9;90%置信区间[CI]-0.9至13.5)。与ITM相比,QLB降低了6小时静息疼痛评分(平均差2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 4.5];P<0.001)。与单独使用ITM相比,ITM+QLB降低了6小时静息疼痛(平均差3.3 [1.9, 4.8];P<0.001)、6小时咳嗽疼痛(3.0 [1.4, 4.7];P<0.001)和24小时最严重疼痛(1.8 [0.6, 3.1];P=0.006)。各组间的羟考酮消耗量和恶心或呕吐无差异。与单独使用ITM相比,QLB和ITM+QLB组瘙痒更常见,但主要为轻度。QLB与ITM在24小时QoR-40方面的非劣效性无定论。然而,与ITM相比,QLB减少了早期静息疼痛,而ITM+QLB与单独使用ITM相比进一步减少了早期静息疼痛、咳嗽疼痛和24小时最严重疼痛。需要更大规模的试验来证实这些发现。NCT02871713(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02871713)。
基础研究 (1篇)
Chronic pain has historically been managed with pharmacological therapies, including opioids that provide potent analgesia, but their sustainability is limited by dose-dependent risks of misuse, addiction, and overdose. Electroceuticals offer a non-pharmacologic alternative by modulating neural pathways through electrical stimulation, but current invasive systems require surgery and clinical supervision, whereas non-invasive devices suffer from poor therapeutic efficacy caused by unstable skin-electrode impedance. Here, we present a thermoresponsive, electrically conductive adhesive microneedle (TEAM) electroceutical that integrates low-impedance microneedle arrays and conductive hydrogel coatings within a compact wireless platform enabling IoT-based telemedicine for safe, remotely managed pain therapy with robust therapeutic outcomes. Experimental and analytical results demonstrate that TEAM improves charge injection efficiency and neural activation while maintaining electrical and thermal safety. The device achieves superior analgesic efficacy compared to conventional gel-based transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in preclinical models, with performance comparable to pharmacological analgesics. IoT-enabled demonstrations further validate the feasibility of remote and scheduled therapy, as well as proof-of-concept automatically triggered neuromodulation guided by physiological pain-induced stress markers in human subjects. TEAM provides a foundation for scalable electroceutical therapy and holds promise for future preclinical-to-clinical translation toward real-world digital pain management.
中文摘要:慢性疼痛历来采用药物治疗,包括提供强效镇痛的阿片类药物,但其可持续性受到滥用、成瘾和过量等剂量依赖性风险的限制。电刺激装置通过电刺激调节神经通路,提供了一种非药物替代方案,但当前的侵入性系统需要手术和临床监督,而非侵入性装置则因皮肤-电极阻抗不稳定而导致治疗效果不佳。在此,我们提出一种热响应、导电粘附微针(TEAM)电刺激装置,它将低阻抗微针阵列和导电水凝胶涂层集成于一个紧凑的无线平台中,实现基于物联网的远程医疗,从而进行安全、远程管理的疼痛治疗,并取得稳健的治疗结果。实验和分析结果表明,TEAM在保持电气和热安全的同时,提高了电荷注入效率和神经激活能力。在临床前模型中,TEAM相比传统的基于凝胶的经皮神经电刺激具有更优的镇痛效果,其性能可与药理学镇痛药相媲美。物联网演示进一步验证了远程和定时治疗的可行性,以及由生理性疼痛诱导的应激标志物引导的自动触发神经调控的人类受试者概念验证。TEAM为可扩展的电刺激治疗奠定了基础,并为未来从临床前向临床转化、实现真实世界数字疼痛管理带来了希望。
3慢病管理 (2篇)
临床研究 (2篇)
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction causes high mortality and recurrent hospitalizations in India. We evaluated the effectiveness of the collaborative care model in improving days alive and out of the hospital and overall survival. We conducted a parallel-group, cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 1507 adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across 22 centers in India (CTRI/2021/11/037797). Centers were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or usual care. Participants were followed up for 2 years. The intervention included risk stratification, lifestyle and pharmacological optimization, and a nurse-coordinated, mobile health-supported disease management program with self-care education, active follow-up, and continuous outpatient monitoring throughout the study period. The primary outcome was days alive and out of the hospital, and all-cause mortality was assessed as a secondary outcome. Days alive and out of the hospital was analyzed with a one-inflated β model. All-cause mortality was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the clustered study design. Among 1507 participants (752 usual care; 755 intervention), the mean age was 61.9 years, and 77.6% were men. All participants except one completed 24 months of follow-up. Most participants (70%) had low educational attainment; 57.3% lived in rural areas; and ischemic heart disease was the predominant cause (77.4%). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the intervention and usual care groups. In the one-inflated β model, the probability of surviving up to 730 days without hospitalization was 79.4% (95% CI, 77.7%-81.2%) in the usual care group and 84.0% (95% CI, 82.2%-85.8%) in the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group had 78% higher odds of achieving a percent days alive and out of the hospital of exactly 1 (730/730 days) compared with those in the usual care group (odds ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.42-2.23]). There were 201 deaths (26.73%) in the usual care group compared with 163 deaths (21.59%) in the intervention group (risk ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97]). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, the intervention group had a 22% lower mortality risk than the usual care group (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.95]; P=0.028). A nurse-coordinated, mobile health-supported collaborative care model for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in India increased the number of days alive and out of hospital, raised the absolute probability of remaining out of hospital by 4.5 percentage points, and reduced all-cause mortality by 22%. URL: www.ctri.nic.in; Unique identifier: CTRI/2021/11/037797.
中文摘要:心力衰竭伴射血分数降低在印度导致高死亡率和反复住院。我们评估了协作护理模式在改善存活且不住院天数及总生存期方面的有效性。我们进行了一项平行组、整群随机对照试验,纳入印度22个中心的1507名射血分数降低的心力衰竭成人患者(CTRI/2021/11/037797)。中心按1:1随机分配至干预组或常规护理组。参与者随访2年。干预包括风险分层、生活方式和药理学优化,以及护士协调、移动健康支持的患者管理计划,包括自我护理教育、主动随访和研究期间持续的门诊监测。主要结局是存活且不住院天数,全因死亡率作为次要结局。采用一膨胀β模型分析存活且不住院天数。采用针对整群研究设计校正的Cox比例风险模型分析全因死亡率。1507名参与者中(常规护理752人;干预755人),平均年龄61.9岁,77.6%为男性。除一人外,所有参与者均完成24个月随访。大多数参与者(70%)教育程度较低;57.3%居住在农村地区;缺血性心脏病是主要原因(77.4%)。干预组和常规护理组的基线特征具有可比性。在一膨胀β模型中,常规护理组存活730天且无住院的概率为79.4%(95% CI, 77.7%-81.2%),干预组为84.0%(95% CI, 82.2%-85.8%)。与常规护理组相比,干预组参与者实现存活且不住院天数比例恰好为1(730/730天)的几率高出78%(比值比,1.78 [95% CI, 1.42-2.23])。常规护理组有201例死亡(26.73%),干预组有163例死亡(21.59%)(风险比,0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97])。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,干预组的死亡风险比常规护理组低22%(风险比,0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.95];P=0.028)。在印度,针对射血分数降低的心力衰竭的护士协调、移动健康支持的协作护理模式增加了存活且不住院天数,使不住院的绝对概率提高4.5个百分点,并降低全因死亡率22%。URL: www.ctri.nic.in; 唯一标识符:CTRI/2021/11/037797。
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis frequently associated with systemic comorbidities such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), arthritis, and hematologic disorders. Management remains challenging due to heterogeneous presentations and treatment responses. To propose a comorbidity-guided therapeutic framework. A clinical review of clinical trials, case series, and real-world reports on PG management was conducted. Emphasis was placed on immunopathologic pathways linking PG with major comorbidities and on therapeutic strategies employing biologic and small-molecule agents tailored to these associations. Comorbidity-directed therapy, such as TNF inhibition for IBD-associated PG, IL-1 blockade for autoinflammatory syndromes, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition for arthritis overlap, resulted in higher healing rates and lower relapse risk across studies. Real-world cases demonstrate that individualized therapy addressing the underlying systemic drivers of skin disease may yield more durable ulcer healing than empiric therapy alone. A comorbidity-guided approach personalizes PG therapy, aligning dermatologic and systemic management to improve healing, minimize recurrence, and optimize patient outcomes.
中文摘要:坏疽性脓皮病(PG)是一种中性粒细胞性皮肤病,常与炎症性肠病(IBD)、关节炎和血液系统疾病等系统性合并症相关。由于其临床表现和治疗反应异质性大,管理仍具挑战性。本文旨在提出一种以合并症为导向的治疗框架。对PG管理的临床试验、病例系列和真实世界报告进行了临床综述,重点关注将PG与主要合并症联系起来的免疫病理通路,以及针对这些关联采用生物制剂和小分子药物的治疗策略。以合并症为导向的治疗,如对IBD相关PG采用TNF抑制、对自身炎症综合征采用IL-1阻断、对关节炎重叠采用Janus激酶(JAK)抑制,在各项研究中获得了更高的愈合率和更低的复发风险。真实世界病例表明,针对皮肤病的潜在系统性驱动因素的个体化治疗可能比经验性治疗更持久地促进溃疡愈合。以合并症为导向的方法使PG治疗个体化,将皮肤病学与系统性管理相结合,以改善愈合、减少复发并优化患者结局。
4伤口护理 (1篇)
基础研究 (1篇)
Diabetic wounds are highly susceptible to bacterial infection and exhibit impaired healing largely driven by defective neutrophil function. Herein, we developed an immunomodulatory hydrogel hybridized with a diselenide-bridged polymer (HHD) to regulate neutrophil fate for effective wound management. HHD demonstrates stepwise, glucose- and ROS-responsive drug release. The initially released L-arginine and pyridoxamine improve wound microenvironment by promoting angiogenesis and suppressing advanced glycation end products. Upon infection, this remodeled microenvironment enhances the recruitment and antibacterial capacity of neutrophils, enabling diabetic wounds to regain the ability to form early inflammatory zones and promptly clear invasive bacteria. Furthermore, excessive ROS generated from antimicrobial immunity degrades neutrophil-targeted polymers, releasing an NLRP3 inhibitor that suppresses inflammasome overactivation and accelerates neutrophil apoptosis, thereby facilitating macrophage efferocytosis to initiate tissue repair. We tracked HHD-shaped neutrophils and confirmed their efficacy in preventing infection and accelerating wound healing. Collectively, HHD represents a promising treatment platform for neutrophil-dependent diabetic wound care. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Neutrophil dysfunction is a key factor leading to infection and impaired healing of diabetic wounds. Significant challenges remain in achieving comprehensive regulation of neutrophil fate. In this work, we construct an immunomodulatory composite hydrogel to regulate neutrophil fate in diabetic wounds: 1) Improving the wound microenvironment, enhancing neutrophil recruitment, and strengthening its antibacterial activity; 2) Inducing neutrophil apoptosis through the neutrophil-targeting polymer; 3) Facilitating macrophage efferocytosis and phenotypic switching via apoptotic neutrophils, thereby expediting tissue repair.
中文摘要:糖尿病伤口易受细菌感染,且愈合受损,主要由中性粒细胞功能缺陷驱动。我们开发了一种与二硒键桥联聚合物杂交的免疫调节水凝胶(HHD),以调节中性粒细胞命运,实现有效的伤口管理。HHD表现出逐步的、葡萄糖和活性氧响应的药物释放。最初释放的L-精氨酸和吡哆胺通过促进血管生成和抑制晚期糖基化终产物来改善伤口微环境。感染时,这种重塑的微环境增强中性粒细胞的募集和抗菌能力,使糖尿病伤口恢复形成早期炎症区和及时清除入侵细菌的能力。此外,抗菌免疫产生的过量活性氧降解中性粒细胞靶向聚合物,释放NLRP3抑制剂,抑制炎症小体过度激活并加速中性粒细胞凋亡,从而促进巨噬细胞胞葬作用以启动组织修复。我们追踪HHD成形的中性粒细胞,并证实其预防感染和加速伤口愈合的功效。总之,HHD代表了依赖中性粒细胞的糖尿病伤口护理的一种有前景的治疗平台。意义声明:中性粒细胞功能障碍是导致糖尿病伤口感染和愈合受损的关键因素,实现中性粒细胞命运的全面调控仍面临重大挑战。在这项工作中,我们构建了一种免疫调节复合水凝胶来调节糖尿病伤口中的中性粒细胞命运:1)改善伤口微环境,增强中性粒细胞募集并加强其抗菌活性;2)通过中性粒细胞靶向聚合物诱导中性粒细胞凋亡;3)通过凋亡中性粒细胞促进巨噬细胞胞葬作用和表型转换,从而加速组织修复。
5远程护理 (1篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
Diabetes during pregnancy, whether gestational (GDM) or pre-existing, is associated with increased maternal and neonatal risks. Remote care has shown promise in diabetes management, however, its impact on antenatal diabetes care remains unclear. This review evaluates its impact compared with usual care for pregnant women with diabetes, using the Institute of Medicine's healthcare quality framework: effectiveness, safety, efficiency, timeliness, patient-centredness, and equity. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, MIDIRS, Scopus, Cochrane, and Global Health) were searched for studies published between January 01, 2005 and April 30, 2026, with no geographic or language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened studies and assessed quality using Cochrane tools. A narrative synthesis and meta-analyses were performed. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251024685). Of 1106 unique studies retrieved, 45 were included (n = 26,562), comprising 20 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 25 non-randomised studies. Most studies focused on GDM only (n = 37), with the remainder including mixed GDM and pre-gestational diabetes (n = 6) or pre-gestational diabetes only (n = 2). Remote care was generally comparable to usual care across most effectiveness and safety outcomes. In non-randomised studies, remote care was associated with lower unspecified caesarean section rates (relative risk [RR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99), postpartum HbA1c (MD -0.08%, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.01), and postpartum 2-h post-prandial glucose levels (MD -1.04 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.59 to -0.48). In RCTs, remote care was associated with reduced emergency caesarean section (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.92) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.92). For patient-centredness, patient satisfaction was consistently high. Efficiency findings (cost savings and appointment frequency) were mixed. Three studies assessed timeliness, with no differences observed. Equity outcomes were rarely quantified, though several interventions incorporated cultural, linguistic, or technological adaptations to improve accessibility. Remote care is a safe and effective alternative to usual care for pregnant women with diabetes, with safety advantages including reduced emergency caesarean sections and NICU admissions. Further research is required to evaluate long-term postpartum outcomes and equitable adoption across diverse populations. This study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) North West London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (NIHR NWL PSRC, NIHR204292).
中文摘要:妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)或孕前糖尿病均与母体和新生儿风险增加相关。远程护理在糖尿病管理中显示出前景,但其对产前糖尿病护理的影响仍不清楚。本综述采用美国医学研究所的医疗质量框架(有效性、安全性、效率、及时性、以患者为中心和公平性),评估远程护理与常规护理相比对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的影响。我们进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、MIDIRS、Scopus、Cochrane和Global Health七个电子数据库,查找2005年1月1日至2026年4月30日期间发表的研究,无地域或语言限制。两位独立评审员筛选研究并使用Cochrane工具评估质量。进行了叙述性综合和荟萃分析。本综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251024685)。在检索到的1106项独特研究中,纳入45项(n=26,562),包括20项随机对照试验(RCT)和25项非随机研究。大多数研究仅关注GDM(n=37),其余为GDM与孕前糖尿病混合(n=6)或仅孕前糖尿病(n=2)。远程护理在大多数有效性和安全性结局方面与常规护理总体相当。在非随机研究中,远程护理与未明确分型的剖宫产率降低(相对风险[RR] 0.95,95% CI 0.91-0.99)、产后HbA1c降低(均数差[MD] -0.08%,95% CI -0.15至-0.01)及产后2小时餐后血糖降低(MD -1.04 mmol/L,95% CI -1.59至-0.48)相关。在RCT中,远程护理与急诊剖宫产率降低(RR 0.59,95% CI 0.38-0.92)和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住率降低(RR 0.73,95% CI 0.57-0.92)相关。在以患者为中心方面,患者满意度持续较高。效率结果(成本节约和就诊频率)好坏参半。三项研究评估了及时性,未观察到差异。公平性结局很少被量化,但若干干预措施纳入了文化、语言或技术调整以提高可及性。远程护理是妊娠期糖尿病孕妇安全有效的常规护理替代方案,并具有安全性优势,包括减少急诊剖宫产和NICU入住。需要进一步研究来评估长期产后结局及在多样化人群中的公平推广。本研究由国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)西北伦敦患者安全研究协作组(NIHR NWL PSRC,NIHR204292)资助。
6静脉治疗/输液护理 (1篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
Licensed, ready-to-administer injectable medicines can reduce medication errors, minimise waste, and streamline perioperative workflows, but higher acquisition costs have limited uptake in England. This study evaluated the economic impact of switching selected anaesthetic and critical care medicines from conventional ampoules and vials to licensed prefilled syringes within NHS practice. An economic model compared current mixed-use practice with a hypothetical switch to 100% licensed ready-to-administer products for eight medicines: epinephrine 1 mg in 10 ml, ephedrine 30 mg, atropine 3 mg, rocuronium 100 mg in 10 ml, lidocaine (1% and 2%), and midazolam (5 mg in 5 ml and 50 mg in 50 ml). Modelled cost components included medicine acquisition, wastage, nursing preparation time, consumables and preventable adverse drug events. Preparation time reductions were interpreted as capacity release rather than workflow substitution. Deterministic sensitivity analyses explored variation in key assumptions and procurement thresholds. Under the modelling assumptions, epinephrine, ephedrine, atropine and lidocaine 2% were associated with reduced overall system costs of more than £5.3 million annually, largely driven by reduced wastage, preparation workload and modelled adverse drug events. Rocuronium and midazolam were associated with increased costs because of higher acquisition prices despite operational advantages. Sensitivity analyses did not alter the direction of findings. Substantial price reductions would be required for certain medicines to achieve cost neutrality. Licensed ready-to-administer injectable medicines can provide safety and workflow advantages and be associated with economic benefit. Acquisition cost remains a barrier, but broader adoption and market development could improve affordability.
中文摘要:已获许可的即用型注射药物可减少用药错误、最大限度减少浪费并简化围手术期工作流程,但在英国,较高的采购成本限制了其应用。本研究评估了在英国国家医疗服务体系实践中,将选定麻醉和重症监护药物从传统安瓿瓶和小瓶转换为已获许可的预充式注射器的经济影响。一项经济模型比较了当前混合使用实践与八种药物100%转换为已获许可的即用型产品的假设情况:肾上腺素1mg/10ml、麻黄碱30mg、阿托品3mg、罗库溴铵100mg/10ml、利多卡因(1%和2%)以及咪达唑仑(5mg/5ml和50mg/50ml)。模型成本组成部分包括药品采购、浪费、护理准备时间、消耗品和可预防的不良药物事件。准备时间减少被解释为容量释放而非工作流程替代。确定性敏感性分析探讨了关键假设和采购阈值的变化。在模型假设下,肾上腺素、麻黄碱、阿托品和2%利多卡因每年可降低总系统成本超过530万英镑,主要归因于浪费减少、准备工作量减少和模型化不良药物事件减少。罗库溴铵和咪达唑仑尽管具有操作优势,但因采购成本较高而导致成本增加。敏感性分析未改变结果方向。某些药物需要大幅降价才能实现成本中性。已获许可的即用型注射药物可提供安全和流程优势,并具有经济获益。采购成本仍是障碍,但更广泛的采用和市场发展可提高可负担性。
7急危重症护理 (1篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
Population-based sex differences in large vessel occlusion (LVO) screening and thrombectomy use for acute ischemic stroke are not well understood. We compared the detection of LVO, thrombectomy use, and long-term clinical outcomes in female versus male patients with cerebral ischemia in Ontario, Canada. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Ontario Stroke Registry linked with health administrative data. We included adult patients hospitalized for cerebral ischemia within the first 24 hours of last seen normal time during 2 fiscal years (2019/2020 and 2022/2023). We used modified Poisson regression models to evaluate sex differences in intracranial neurovascular imaging, thrombolysis, or thrombectomy. Among patients with LVO, we used Cox proportional hazard and cause-specific hazard models to compare female versus male patients long-term mortality, readmission, or nursing home admission until 2025, stratified by thrombectomy treatment. Among 16 935 eligible patients (47% female patients; median age, 76 [interquartile range, 65-84] years), female patients were less likely than male patients to receive intracranial neurovascular imaging (83.6% female versus 87.8% male; P<0.01). Among those who underwent imaging, 19.3% of female patients had an LVO compared with 15.9% of male patients (P<0.01). Thrombectomy use was higher in female patients than male patients in the overall cohort (adjusted relative risk, 1.08 [1.01-1.16]), but, once restricted to those with LVO, thrombectomy use was similar (adjusted relative risk, 0.98 [0.93-1.03]). Adjusted hazard of the composite outcome was lower in female patients with LVO treated with thrombectomy compared with their male counterparts (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88 [0.77-0.99]). Female patients with acute cerebral ischemia were less likely than male patients to receive intracranial neurovascular imaging but more likely to have an LVO, and long-term mortality was lower in female patients with LVO treated with thrombectomy. Stroke outcomes' research must account for neurovascular imaging and LVO status to accurately identify sex-based disparities in stroke care and outcomes.
中文摘要:基于人群的急性缺血性卒中大血管闭塞(LVO)筛查和取栓使用中的性别差异尚不清楚。我们在加拿大安大略省比较了女性和男性脑缺血患者中LVO的检出、取栓使用及长期临床结局。这项回顾性队列研究使用了安大略省卒中登记数据,并与健康管理数据相关联。我们纳入了在2019/2020和2022/2023两个财政年度内,最后正常时间24小时内因脑缺血住院的成年患者。我们使用修正泊松回归模型评估性别在颅内神经血管成像、溶栓或取栓方面的差异。在LVO患者中,我们使用Cox比例风险模型和原因特异性风险模型比较女性和男性患者的长期死亡率、再入院或养老院入住(直至2025年),并按取栓治疗进行分层。在16935名符合条件的患者中(47%女性;中位年龄76岁[四分位距65-84]),女性患者接受颅内神经血管成像的可能性低于男性(83.6%对87.8%;P<0.01)。在接受成像的患者中,19.3%的女性患者有LVO,而男性为15.9%(P<0.01)。在整个队列中,女性患者的取栓使用率高于男性(校正相对风险1.08[1.01-1.16]),但一旦限制在LVO患者中,取栓使用相似(校正相对风险0.98[0.93-1.03])。在经取栓治疗的LVO患者中,女性患者的复合结局校正风险低于男性(校正风险比0.88[0.77-0.99])。急性脑缺血女性患者接受颅内神经血管成像的可能性低于男性,但更可能患有LVO,且接受取栓治疗的女性LVO患者长期死亡率更低。卒中结局研究必须考虑神经血管成像和LVO状态,以准确识别卒中护理和结局中的性别差异。
8肿瘤护理 (1篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
While opioids remain the primary pharmacological intervention for cancer pain management, their clinical utility is frequently compromised by dose-limiting toxicities. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and clinical hierarchy of non-opioid adjuvant drug classes. The study was structured around the PICO framework to evaluate the pharmacological strategies currently utilized in multimodal clinical oncology. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2025. The primary outcome was global analgesic efficacy (standardized mean difference [SMD]), while secondary outcomes included the opioid-sparing effect, defined as the percentage reduction in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (Harms). A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to rank treatments using SUCRA values. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool. Twenty-three RCTs (n = 1845) met the inclusion criteria. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (-1.10) and anticonvulsants (-1.06) demonstrated the most robust analgesic effects. The SUCRA ranking confirmed a clear hierarchy, with the combination of anticonvulsants and antidepressants showing the highest probability of efficacy. A significant opioid-sparing effect was observed for gabapentinoids and ketamine, facilitating MEDD reduction. While serious adverse events were rare, minor harms (somnolence, dizziness) were more frequent in the most effective classes. Our NMA provides a robust evidence base for a "Clinical Tier" system, ranking adjuvants by their balance of efficacy and safety. These findings support the early integration of Tier I agents (anticonvulsants and NSAIDs) to optimize pain control and reduce opioid-related toxicities in chronic cancer pain management.
中文摘要:尽管阿片类药物仍是癌症疼痛管理的主要药物干预手段,但其临床应用常因剂量限制性毒性而受到影响。本研究旨在确定非阿片类辅助药物类别的相对疗效、阿片类药物节约潜力及临床层级。研究围绕PICO框架设计,以评估当前肿瘤多模式临床实践中所采用的药物策略。系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane电子数据库中2000年至2025年间发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局指标为总体镇痛疗效(标准化均数差SMD),次要结局指标包括阿片类药物节约效应(定义为吗啡等效日剂量MEDD的百分比降幅)以及治疗期间不良事件(Harms)的发生率。采用贝叶斯网络meta分析(NMA),以SUCRA值对治疗措施进行排序。方法学质量采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)进行评估。共纳入23项随机对照试验(n=1845)。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(-1.10)和抗惊厥药(-1.06)显示出最稳健的镇痛效果。SUCRA排序证实了明确的层级,抗惊厥药与抗抑郁药联合使用的疗效概率最高。加巴喷丁类药物和氯胺酮显示出显著的阿片类药物节约效应,有助于降低MEDD。虽然严重不良事件罕见,但在疗效最佳的药物类别中,轻微不良事件(嗜睡、头晕)更为常见。我们的NMA为「临床分级」系统提供了强有力的证据基础,根据疗效与安全性的平衡对辅助药物进行排序。这些研究结果支持早期整合一线药物(抗惊厥药和非甾体抗炎药),以优化慢性癌症疼痛管理中的疼痛控制并减少阿片类药物相关毒性。
9老年护理 (1篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
Vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates are needed to determine the effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccinations during their first season of availability among populations at high risk for severe RSV. To assess RSV VE against RSV-associated outcomes for nursing home residents. This retrospective cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries used electronic medical claims data from September 10, 2023, to March 30, 2024. A cohort was created for each outcome: an RSV-associated hospitalization cohort; an RSV-associated death cohort; a severe RSV-associated outcome cohort; and an RSV-associated thromboembolic event cohort. To be eligible for inclusion in a cohort, a Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary must be aged 65 years or older, reside in a US nursing home during the study period for at least 1 day, have continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A and B (365 days prior to the index date), and have continuous enrollment in Part D (beginning on June 21, 2023). RSV vaccination. Outcomes were RSV-associated hospitalization, RSV-associated death, severe RSV-associated outcomes (intensive care unit or critical care unit admission, medical ventilator use, or RSV-associated death), and RSV-associated thromboembolic event. RSV diagnoses and outcome definitions were based on claims with relevant International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes. RSV vaccine doses were determined from Medicare Part D claims using the National Drug Code Directory. Hazard ratios (HRs) from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models compared the times to first outcomes among RSV vaccinated beneficiaries and unvaccinated beneficiaries. VE was calculated as (1-HR) × 100%. Of 597 430 included Medicare beneficiaries (66% female; median age, 82 [IQR, 75-88] years), RSV VE against RSV-associated hospitalizations was 73% (95% CI, 65%-79%). Among beneficiaries aged 65 to 74 years VE was 60% (95% CI, 35%-76%), 75% (95% CI, 67%-82%) among beneficiaries 75 years or older, 67% (95% CI, 55%-76%) among short-stay residents (<100 cumulative days), and 80% (95% CI, 68%-87%) among long-stay residents (≥100 cumulative days). VE against RSV-associated death was 56% (95% CI, 39%-69%), VE against severe RSV-associated outcomes was 59% (95% CI, 44%-70%), and VE against RSV-associated thromboembolic events was 66% (95% CI, 44%-79%). In this study, in the first season of availability, RSV vaccines were associated with improved RSV-associated outcomes among US Medicare beneficiaries residing in nursing homes.
中文摘要:需要获得疫苗有效性估计值,以确定呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗在第一个可用季节中对严重RSV高危人群的有效性。评估RSV疫苗对养老院居民RSV相关结局的有效性。这项对联邦医疗保险按服务收费受益人的回顾性队列研究使用2023年9月10日至2024年3月30日的电子医疗索赔数据。为每个结局分别创建队列:RSV相关住院队列、RSV相关死亡队列、严重RSV相关结局队列以及RSV相关血栓栓塞事件队列。要符合纳入队列的条件,联邦医疗保险按服务收费受益人必须年满65岁,在研究期间在美国养老院居住至少1天,在索引日期前连续投保A部分和B部分365天,并且从2023年6月21日起连续投保D部分。RSV疫苗接种。结局包括RSV相关住院、RSV相关死亡、严重RSV相关结局(重症监护室或危重症监护室入住、使用医用呼吸机或RSV相关死亡)以及RSV相关血栓栓塞事件。RSV诊断和结局定义基于具有相关国际疾病分类第十次修订代码的索赔。RSV疫苗剂量通过国家药品代码目录从D部分索赔中确定。应用多变量Cox比例风险模型的风险比比较了已接种和未接种RSV疫苗受益人首次结局的时间。疫苗有效性计算为(1-HR)×100%。在597,430名纳入的联邦医疗保险受益人(66%女性;中位年龄82[四分位距,75-88]岁)中,RSV疫苗对RSV相关住院的有效性为73%(95%CI,65%-79%)。在65至74岁受益人之间,VE为60%(95%CI,35%-76%),75岁及以上受益人中为75%(95%CI,67%-82%),短期居住居民(累计<100天)为67%(95%CI,55%-76%),长期居住居民(累计≥100天)为80%(95%CI,68%-87%)。对RSV相关死亡的有效性为56%(95%CI,39%-69%),对严重RSV相关结局的有效性为59%(95%CI,44%-70%),对RSV相关血栓栓塞事件的有效性为66%(95%CI,44%-79%)。在这项研究中,在第一个可用季节中,RSV疫苗与美国养老院联邦医疗保险受益人RSV相关结局的改善相关。
10患者安全 (1篇)
临床研究 (1篇)
Translational simulation is an emerging approach that operationalises simulation as a tool to explore and improve healthcare systems. Anaesthesia represents a well-suited context for translational simulation; however, the applications, processes, outcomes, and factors influencing the implementation of translational simulation in anaesthesia are poorly characterised. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Google Scholar were searched for studies using translational simulation approaches to explore or improve multidisciplinary anaesthetic care. Two independent reviewers performed study selection. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using Thomas and Harden's approach to inductive qualitative synthesis. Of 5760 unique citations, 149 were included, involving more than 3300 anaesthesia staff across 37 countries. Most studies used translational simulation to identify latent safety threats and optimise protocols, resulting in structural or procedural modifications in 113 studies. A total of nine process domains, including 90 translational processes, were identified. Applications of translational simulation predominantly focused on crisis management rather than routine perioperative care, and the involvement of conceptual frameworks and contemporary safety sciences (e.g. Safety-II) was infrequent. Although signals of improved patient outcomes were reported, causal attribution remains limited by a predominance of quasi-experimental designs. Implementation relied heavily upon executive sponsorship and integration into clinical governance to overcome workforce and logistical barriers. Translational simulation has been widely operationalised in anaesthesia as a pragmatic systems engineering tool. To mature as a scientific discipline, future translational simulation initiatives must adopt standardised nomenclature, explore high-volume routine perioperative care, and transition from ad hoc projects to theory-informed programmes embedded within hospital quality and safety structures. PROSPERO CRD420251013645.
中文摘要:翻译性模拟是一种新兴方法,将模拟作为探索和改善医疗保健系统的工具加以操作化。麻醉是翻译性模拟非常适合的背景;然而,翻译性模拟在麻醉中的应用、过程、结果及影响其实施的因素尚不明确。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、护理与联合健康文献累积索引及Google Scholar,以寻找使用翻译性模拟方法探索或改善多学科麻醉护理的研究。两名独立评审员进行文献筛选。数据提取和偏倚风险评估采用Thomas和Harden的归纳性定性综合方法。在5760条独特引文中,纳入149篇,涉及37个国家的3300多名麻醉人员。大多数研究使用翻译性模拟来识别潜在安全隐患并优化方案,其中113项研究导致了结构或程序性修改。共确定了9个过程领域,包括90个翻译过程。翻译性模拟的应用主要集中于危机管理而非常规围手术期护理,且概念框架和当代安全科学(如Safety-II)的参与很少。尽管报告了患者结局改善的信号,但因果归因仍受限于以类实验设计为主。实施在很大程度上依赖于行政发起和临床治理的整合,以克服人力和后勤障碍。翻译性模拟已在麻醉领域作为务实的系统工程工具被广泛操作化。为了使其发展为一门科学学科,未来的翻译性模拟举措必须采用标准化的术语,探索高容量的常规围手术期护理,并从临时项目过渡到嵌入医院质量和安全结构的理论指导项目。PROSPERO CRD420251013645。